Oh, good!  Now we just need someone to implement the behavior for ref 
intents and document the old and new behavior...  :)  I'm hoping that the 
implementation will be a fairly simple matter of finding and duplicating 
the logic that's used for 'inout' intents.

-Brad


On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Chris Doris wrote:

> Aha! I was not aware that there was this special case for out and inout
> intents --- it's not in the spec. If I was, I would merely have suggested
> extending it to the ref intent.  I agree that syntax shouldn't be added
> without good reason, it was just the easiest way to explain the feature.
>
> This discussion has deepened my understanding of Chapel.  Thank you!
>
> Chris
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK 
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Chapel-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-developers

Reply via email to