After bisecting the commit log I found that commit 22715 is responsible for
this issue.  Oddly, before the script actually exits my system becomes
unable to create new threads and grep says it is unable to find log files.

- Chris


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Brad Chamberlain <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I don't have any insights, but will note that in our use cases, we tend
> not to use paratest to oversubscribe testing on a single machine; rather we
> farm out across multiple machines; so there may be some race/conflict which
> only shows up in that situation?
>
> Assuming any issue is in the paratest servers themselves, it shouldn't
> take you long to do the binary search -- I think there have only been five
> changes to it since Jan.
>
> -Brad
>
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Tom Hildebrandt wrote:
>
>  Hi Chris:
>> The other change that I made in paratest.server was to remove the "wait"
>> command on line 172 or thereabouts, so the timeout time is updated each
>> second.  I can't really see how this would cause the error messages you're
>> seeing.  On the other hand, I have never tested by forking a number of
>> children equal to the number of processors available. I'll give that a try
>> (most likely this evening).
>>
>> Tom H.
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> _________________
>>
>> From: Chris Wailes [[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:34 PM
>> To: Tom Hildebrandt
>> Cc: Brad Chamberlain; Lydia Duncan; chapel-developers@lists.
>> sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Chapel-developers] Paratest and TooManyThreads.chpl
>>
>> I've been playing with this for a couple of days now, and even with skipif
>> files for what I thought were the offending directories I end up getting
>> the
>> following output (https://gist.github.com/chriswailes/
>> a1b0c4d8df4eb983607c)
>> before the paratest.server script fails.  Running start_test works just
>> fine,
>> but if I try to run even 4 tests at once on my quad-core, hyperthreaded
>> machine, I get these error messages.
>>
>> I haven't been as diligent with my rebasing as I should have been, so the
>> last time I know the mainline's version of the scripts worked was on
>> January
>> 29th.  Does anyone know what might have changed since then to have caused
>> this problem?  Before I was able to run 10 tests at a time on this same
>> machine.  I'm about to head home now, but tomorrow I'll run a binary
>> search
>> on the commit history to try and pin down the commit that caused this to
>> stop
>> working.
>>
>> - Chris
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Tom Hildebrandt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>       That is correct.
>>       Note also that the .skipif file the skips a directory and it
>>       descendents is a sibling of the directory to be skipped, whereas
>>       the directory-wide SKIPIF file resides within the directory it
>>       affects.  Compare
>>         test/chpldoc          <-- Skip testing here and in all
>>       descendents
>>         test/chpldoc.skipif  <-- if this script tests true.
>>       vs.
>>         test/distributions/deitz/SKIPIF <-- Skip testing in the
>>       containing directory (only) if this script tests true.
>>
>>       THH
>>       ________________________________________
>>       From: Brad Chamberlain [[email protected]]
>>       Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 6:37 AM
>>       To: Lydia Duncan; [email protected]
>>       Subject: Re: [Chapel-developers] Paratest and TooManyThreads.chpl
>>
>>       IIRC, a difference between the two approaches is that putting it
>>       in
>>       the parent skips all recursive traversal below that directory as
>>       well,
>>       whereas putting it within the directory just skips that
>>       directory, but
>>       not its children?
>>
>>       -Brad
>>
>>       ________________________________________
>>       From: Lydia Duncan [[email protected]]
>>       Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 2:57 PM
>>       To: [email protected]
>>       Subject: Re: [Chapel-developers] Paratest and TooManyThreads.chpl
>>
>>       On 03/27/2014 02:53 PM, Chris Wailes wrote:
>>       > Do skipif files work for directories?
>>       Yup!  You can either make a SKIPIF within the directory, or make
>>       a
>>       <dirname>.skipif file in its parent directory.
>>
>>       Lydia
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>>       --
>>       _______________________________________________
>>       Chapel-developers mailing list
>>       [email protected]
>>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-developers
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>>       --
>>       _______________________________________________
>>       Chapel-developers mailing list
>>       [email protected]
>>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-developers
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>>       --
>>       _______________________________________________
>>       Chapel-developers mailing list
>>       [email protected]
>>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-developers
>>
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Chapel-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-developers

Reply via email to