I'm a fan of anything automated that can prevent mistakes. Running
`lookForTabs` with traivs could be handy as well.

-Kyle

On 9/8/14, 3:08 PM, "Thomas Van Doren" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I like the ideas of using travis! I actually started a branch long ago to
>add a .travis.yml to the repo, which I just updated:
>
>https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/pull/342
>
>
>Back then it was taking 60+ minutes to run the builds, but I think it
>would be fast enough now with the smoke test script. I also like that the
>status is integrated into the pull request UI, making it easy for
>reviewers and devs to find out if/when something is broken.
>
>What do others think?
>
>Here is more information about how travis integrates with github pull
>requests:
>
>http://blog.travis-ci.com/2012-09-04-pull-requests-just-got-even-more-awes
>o
>me/
>
>
>
>On 9/8/14, 2:48 PM, "Francisco Souza" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hello hello,
>>Earlier today I broke your smoke tests with pull request #325 :( Sorry
>>about that.
>>
>>I figured out we could use travis for running smoke tests on every
>>pull request, so contributors can see the impact of their changes in
>>the tests.
>>
>>This can be expanded to other tasks as well, like ``make test``.
>>
>>A good thing about travis, is that it can generate a build matrix
>>based on environment and compilers, and it already supports gcc and
>>clang. Here's a still broken example, from my fork:
>>https://travis-ci.org/fsouza/chapel/builds/34755579
>>
>>Any thoughts on this?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Francisco
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>-
>>----
>>Want excitement?
>>Manually upgrade your production database.
>>When you want reliability, choose Perforce
>>Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clk
>>t
>>rk
>>_______________________________________________
>>Chapel-developers mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-developers
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>Want excitement?
>Manually upgrade your production database.
>When you want reliability, choose Perforce
>Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt
>rk
>_______________________________________________
>Chapel-developers mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-developers


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Chapel-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-developers

Reply via email to