Hi Brad, Great; that description is indeed pretty decent; details:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Brad Chamberlain <[email protected]> wrote: > I/we at Cray have not doing anything along the lines of creating a > script, but I believe the requirements listed in README.prereqs are > accurate (or close to it), though it looks like it could be > clarified/streamlined a bit. Summarizing: > > * shell supporting cd, mkdir, rm, echo, ... > * 'env' at /usr/bin/env > The above pieces are/should be typically provided via distro packages, since it is very unlikely that any user build provides any benefit. * Bourne shell at /bin/sh > * C-shell at /bin/csh > * perl > * python > * C/C++ compiler (gcc/g++ assumed by default) > * gmake (or gnu-compatible make) > OK; all of the above would be covered nicely via the following possible dependencies: https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/blob/master/easybuild/easyconfigs/p/PRACE/PRACE-20130605-goolf-1.4.10.eb & https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/blob/master/easybuild/easyconfigs/p/Python/Python-2.7.3-goolf-1.4.10.eb > * bc (not listed in the right places in the README, arguably) > * awk > Also the above are available via open or merged PRs. > (good question comes to mind: has anyone here have already done the homework, while providing a distro-ready package?) OK, the answer is very clearly yes, it was yet-another RTFM situation with just a tiny bit missing. Will take the above into account for future EB releases, to get the builds updated to pristine shape. thanks, F. -- echo "sysadmin know better bash than english"|sed s/min/mins/ \ | sed 's/better bash/bash better/' # Yelling in a CERN forum
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Chapel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users
