Hi Michael,

If you are interested in how modern parallel programming languages
deal in particular with the particle simulation problem, I recommend
you to read the following special issue of the journal Concurrency
and Computation: Practice and Experience:
   http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.v26.4/issuetoc

The actual special issue papers are towards the end of the table of
contents. These paper papers originate from phase 2 of the SICSA
multicore challenge that was about implementing an n-body simulation
in anyone's favourite multicore language and comparing performance.

Happy reading,
   Clemens

On 8/15/14 4:52 PM, Michael Dietrich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working with Chapel due to my bachelor thesis about high
> performance programming languages. My current task is to implement a
> particle simulation program of which I already have the code in C. It
> includes two possible algorithms for calculating the force acting onto
> the particles: A simple but ineffective one and the
> Barnes-Hut-Algorithm [1] which is much faster but a bit more
> complicated. The other calculations aren't that complex so for me only
> the calculation of force is important.
>
> I implemented the simple algorithm at first. For comparing the serial
> and parallel execution time I surrounded everything with a
> serial-statement, evaluating a bool variable I have to set in the
> command line. I didn't implement the multi locale improvement yet so
> it runs only on a dual core PC, using forall-loops. Finally the
> parallel one only needed half of the time of the serial, yay.
>
> I continued with Barnes-Hut. This one was a bit more work because the
> maintenance of the tree-structure leaves a lot of opportunities for
> mistakes. After a bit more time it was working as well.
> My issue is about the parallel execution time of this algorithm. Like
> in the other one I replaced the crucial for-loop with a forall-loop
> (the serial-statement surrounds the whole program). The problem is,
> that the parallel execution time is similar to the serial one,
> sometimes even longer.
> Of course I don't want you to read through all my code, but could you
> tell me some possible reasons, why this effect may occur?
>
> thank you very much
> bye
> Michael
>
>
> [1] http://beltoforion.de/barnes_hut/barnes_hut_en.html
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Chapel-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Clemens Grelck                                     Science Park 904
University Lecturer                                   1098XH Amsterdam
                                                            Netherlands
University of Amsterdam
Institute for Informatics                        T +31 (0) 20 525 8683
Computer Systems Architecture Group              F +31 (0) 20 525 7490

Office C3.105                               www.science.uva.nl/~grelck
----------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Chapel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users

Reply via email to