And Damian McGuckin writes: > On Tue, 19 May 2015, Michael Ferguson wrote: > >> I have verified that GCC at least does not inline frexp. I don't >> understand why it couldn't, but it didn't in my experiments. Neither >> did clang... > > C/C++ does not know the details so cannot expand it. If frexp were > implemented as a template in C++, it is another story, and another > email discussion list.
That's frustrating beyond belief, as gcc+glibc has inlined frexp and ldexp for me in the past. The only reason I can see not to inline them is to control trapping behavior, so possibly the change is on the glibc side. grr. (Why sane accessors are missing from 754 is a long story, much of which I try not to remember.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Chapel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users
