Hi ---
I'm misunderstanding something about locales -- consider the following
program :
record R {
var x : int;
}
proc main() {
var r : R;
var x : int;
writeln("-----");
for loc in Locales do on loc {
writeln('X :',x.locale);
writeln('R :',r.locale);
}
writeln("-----");
coforall loc in Locales do on loc {
writeln('X :',x.locale);
writeln('R :',r.locale);
}
}
$ ./a.out -nl 2
-----
X :LOCALE0
R :LOCALE0
X :LOCALE0
R :LOCALE0
-----
X :LOCALE0
R :LOCALE0
X :LOCALE1
R :LOCALE1
So --- the for and coforall have very different behaviors regarding
locales, which surprised me. I'm guessing this is because coforall makes a
copy (to avoid races on X and R) while for doesn't....
Is this behavior intentional?
Thanks!
-- Nikhil
---------------------------------
Nikhil Padmanabhan
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
Chapel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users
