Sure, that'd be useful, thanks! -Brad
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017, Nikhil Padmanabhan wrote: > Brad, > > Just to close the loop on this, do you want me to file an issue for this? > > Thanks! > -- Nikhil > > --------------------------------- > Nikhil Padmanabhan > [email protected] > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Brad Chamberlain <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Were you suggesting that this should work now? I get a syntax error if I >>> try to pass a tuple as in your example, although if I define a tuple >>> variable as in the code below, it works fine. >>> >> >> No, I wouldn't expect it to work now. I was just offering it up as an >> alternative way to potentially have an intent apply to multiple symbols >> without raising the concerns that the original proposal had for me. >> >> -Brad >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Chapel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users
