Russel,

I don’t know SCons.  Do you like it?  Do you have good examples of using it 
with Chapel?  I rather hate make, but it’s all I have until Mason is ready for 
prime time.

Thanks!
b


~~~~~
May All Your Sequences Converge

> On Mar 22, 2018, at 7:35 AM, Ben Albrecht <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Russel,
> 
> >Whilst I really like the humour (but not humor :-) of chapel, mason, bricks,
> this is going to make searches using DuckDuckGo and other engines really quite
> hard. Religious institutions seem to have their SEO well organised, hiding the
> stuff we are really interested in.
> 
> That is unfortunate. I believe Brad has looked into some SEO-related 
> improvements lately. Hopefully that will improve over time.
> 
> >I have to date been using SCons for building Chapel code, is the time now 
> >right to switch to using Mason? 
> 
> That depends on how you intend to use Mason. If you're primarily using it as 
> a build tool to replace SCons, and are sticking to a pure Chapel project, I 
> would expect it to work pretty well for you.  As Brian has mentioned, Mason 
> only deals with native Chapel packages currently. So if you need non-Chapel 
> dependencies for a package, you may need to wait until that is supported. You 
> can get a sense of the current functionality from the Mason documentation[1], 
> feature roadmap[2], or just by trying it out. If you pursue the latter, we'd 
> love to hear your feedback.
> 
> >Is Mason turning out to be Cargo but repurposed from Rust to Chapel?
> 
> Mason's design was influenced by Cargo among some other package managers. I 
> imagine it would be easy to pick up if you were already familiar with Cargo.
> 
> ~ben
> 
> [1] https://chapel-lang.org/docs/master/tools/mason/mason.html 
> <https://chapel-lang.org/docs/master/tools/mason/mason.html>
> [2] https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/issues/7106 
> <https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/issues/7106>
> From: Russel Winder <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 6:29:04 AM
> To: Chapel_Users
> Subject: On Nomenclature
>  
> Hi,
> 
> Whilst I really like the humour (but not humor :-) of chapel, mason, bricks,
> this is going to make searches using DuckDuckGo and other engines really quite
> hard. Religious institutions seem to have their SEO well organised, hiding the
> stuff we are really interested in.
> 
> I have to date been using SCons for building Chapel code, is the time now
> right to switch to using Mason? Is Mason turning out to be Cargo but
> repurposed from Rust to Chapel?
>   
> -- 
> Russel.
> ==========================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk <http://www.russel.org.uk/>
> Russel Winder's Website <http://www.russel.org.uk/>
> www.russel.org.uk <http://www.russel.org.uk/>
> I think the most important thing for me in learning programming was that I 
> was a theoretical physicist and scientist bringing a scientific method 
> approach to the ...
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! 
> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ 
> <http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________>
> Chapel-users mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Chapel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users

Reply via email to