Chapel 1.17.1 newbie question (my real effort is much more complicated,
but this illustrates the issue):
record A {
type T = real;
var val : T;
proc =(ref lhs: A, rhs : T) : void {
lhs.val = rhs;
}
}
yields:
assign.chpl:4: warning: The left operand of '=' and '<op>=' should
have 'ref' intent.
There are a couple work arounds:
1) put the "proc =" outside the record (but then the T type is no longer
visible).
2) 1+ move "type T" outside the "record" (though it really doesn't
otherwise need that wider visibility).
I've run into this in a number of larger cases. Is there some magic to
doing assignment as a member vs.
non-member function?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Chapel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users
