Judy, The criteria isn't the income or other demographics of the 
neighborhood,but the zoning status of the property.

John
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:43:50 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Chat] schnapp
> 
> I thought those liquor stores located in impoverished residential 
> neighborhoods were the target.
> I didn't know CV was impoverished.
> judy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/25/2012 10:33 AM, Linda Forlifer wrote:
> > I was afraid that the Schnapp Shoppe might be one of the group.  It's much 
> > more than a liquor store, very convenient, and quite well run.  I would 
> > advocate for keeping it as a long-standing asset to Charles Village.  The 
> > owners are responsive to their customers (more so than the liquor store on 
> > St. Paul).  When I've requested a particular item, the Schnapp Shoppe has 
> > gotten it in.
> >
> > On my way walking home from work, I can stop there for milk, a can of 
> > beans, or other necessities.  Yes, they sell liquor, but I consider them a 
> > convenience store.
> >
> > When I attended a meeting about the new zoning plan, they emphasized that a 
> > goal was mixed use, so 1st-floor stores and apartments above would be 
> > encouraged.  The idea supposedly is to create a good environment for urban 
> > living (for people without cars), with a dynamic streetscape that does not 
> > separate residences and businesses serving residents.  To my mind, the 
> > Schnapp Shoppe answers that goal and should remain as it is.
> >
> > Linda
> >
> >>>> Joshua Fruhlinger <[email protected]> 6/23/2012 12:13 PM >>>
> > It means that, if the Schnapp Shop didn't exist and a new store at that 
> > location tried to get a liquor license, it wouldn't be granted.  But the 
> > existing store was grandfathered in because it acquired a liquor license 
> > before the current laws went into effect (in the '70s, I believe.  The law 
> > probably doesn't allow liquor stores in completely residential areas like 
> > the Schnapp Shop anymore.
> >
> > I don't think the closures are a done deal -- there will probably be public 
> > hearings about it, if you're interested.
> >
> > jf
> >
> > On Jun 23, 2012, at 11:55 AM, judy wrote:
> >
> >> The 'Patch' listed the Schnapp shop as one of the liquor stores to be 
> >> sold. The schnapp shop is older than me. It has been part of this 
> >> community soo long. What gives. What does' non-conforming class a license 
> >> mean?
> >>
> >> judy
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Chat mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://charlesvillage.info/mailman/listinfo/chat_charlesvillage.info
> >> archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chat mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://charlesvillage.info/mailman/listinfo/chat_charlesvillage.info
> > archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chat mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://charlesvillage.info/mailman/listinfo/chat_charlesvillage.info
> > archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://charlesvillage.info/mailman/listinfo/chat_charlesvillage.info
> archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
                                          
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[email protected]
http://charlesvillage.info/mailman/listinfo/chat_charlesvillage.info
archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to