On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:23 AM, David Ward Lambert <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not aware of any converts.
"No converts" is fine. Tolerance, familiarity, and accessibility are all good ends in and of themselves. And your data is readable, which is also a good thing. (Personally, I spent more time than I like this last weekend, trying to figure out what an author meant when some of the "math notation" expressions were buggy -- I think that code that actually runs has all sorts of correctness advantages over the ambiguities of standard math notation. And if people can be comfortable with it? That's even better.) Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
