Gotta love email editting by mail transfer systems... Here's a hopefully unmangled instance of that url.
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code:Add_a_Task#Things_to_avoid -- Raul On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > That said, note again that I feel that this distinction is at odds > with the statements made at > http://rosettacode.orhttp://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code:Add_a_Task#Things_to_avoid > > -- > Raul > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >> Feel free to change or add to the entry. >> >> -- >> Raul >> >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Boyko Bantchev <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 14 December 2012 14:T58, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Boyko Bantchev <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> It seems to me that if the title is >>>>> "Horner's rule for polynomial evaluation" >>>>> then the posted code must implement the Horner's rule for polynomial >>>>> evaluation and not just any polynomial evaluation or whatever else. >>>> >>>> In a modern system, and future systems, with code transformations >>>> happening in the compiler and parallel computing resources, it's >>>> doubtful that this will be a meaningful distinction. >>> >>> When it is about using programs, yes. But places like rosettacode are >>> intended for demonstration of source code, so faithful representation >>> of what is being claimed is essential. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
