You are right, "message text garbled" will not solve problems introduced by upstream modifications of the text.
-- Raul On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:30 PM, greg heil <[email protected]> wrote: > Raul > >>i have seen that option before and i did again try it on a few posts. So far >>i have seen no differences effected by it. Indeed i doubt that ANY process >>can be effective ex post facto of an irreversible change made by some MUA. >>Putting those line terminator markers in, which are indistinguishable from >>line end markers the user himself uses, is indeed irreversible. > >>Now that you have mentioned it i will continue to try it though, when >>opportunity arises. > > greg > ~krsnadas.org > > -- > > from: Raul Miller <[email protected]> > to: Chat forum <[email protected]> > date: 30 March 2013 05:37 > subject: Re: [Jchat] [Jbeta] mailing browser > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:21 PM, greg heil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>i am still workiing for a system which can be universal across MUAs and >>>their configurations. i did look at the "show original" of your post and it >>>had the lines > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > >>Since you are using gmail, I think you should try the "message text garbled" >>option in the dropdown menu which currently appears at the upper-right corner >>of the message. > > Thanks, > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
