As was pointed out on /., this so-called success is bogus because of its
self-imposed limitations and the Turing Test itself is of dubious value.

I liked a comment illustrating the first point, alluding to an AI called
"Ya So Dum" that emulates a Chinese toddler.


On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Björn Helgason <[email protected]> wrote:

> Put the AI into a latex doll and......
> On 9 Jun 2014 08:50, "Jack Andrews" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Nice one, Donna.
> >
> > The funniest thing I ever read about the Turing test (well, it wasn't
> > written in terms of that test, but I refer to it as the reverse Turing
> > test)... A hotel wanted to keep up with the competition, so when hotel
> > patrons chose a movie, there were people on roller skates in the basement
> > finding the tape and pushing it into a VCR.
> > If that happened today, I'd be completely fooled into thinking an
> automated
> > system was feeding me. Or maybe it was an automated system...   :)
> >
> > The Turing test has been passed before.
> > It all hangs on the interpretation of the "Turing test".
> >
> > Ta, Jack
> >
> > On Sunday, June 8, 2014, Donna Y <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > TURING TEST SUCCESS MARKS MILESTONE IN COMPUTING HISTORY
> > >
> > > Release Date 08 June 2014
> > >
> > > Donna Y
> > > [email protected] <javascript:;>
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.reading.ac.uk/news-and-events/releases/PR583836.aspx
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 
Devon McCormick, CFA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to