Where would you store the seed? It would have to be stored on the server somewhere, right?
> From: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:26:13 -0700 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Jchat] Project Euler knocked down > > i think he meant pseudo random passwords. > > >i am a big fan of the binary password approach. One could use a unique seed > >(dependent on the service) and a set PRN generator. Thereby getting easy > >peasy remembering and easy generation (and passing on to heirs, > >"power-of-attorney" types etc), yet very good passwords. > > greg > ~krsnadas.org > > -- > > from: Dan Bron <[email protected]> > to: [email protected] > date: 18 June 2014 07:59 > subject: Re: [Jchat] Project Euler knocked down > > Really random passwords? > > http://xkcd.com/936/ > > -- > > from: John Baker <[email protected]> > to: Chat forum <[email protected]> > date: 18 June 2014 07:39 > subject: Re: [Jchat] Project Euler knocked down > > >So crazy that it's probably somebodies' business model. Let's hear it for > >really random passwords. > > -- > > from: Roger Hui <[email protected]> > to: Chat Forum <[email protected]> > date: 18 June 2014 03:18 > subject: Re: [Jchat] Project Euler knocked down > > Harvest passwords? http://xkcd.com/792/ > > -- > > from: alexgian <[email protected]> > to: J Chat forum <[email protected]> > date: 18 June 2014 03:13 > subject: Re: [Jchat] Project Euler knocked down > > >That's not a bad idea John. The thing with PE, though, is that you are not > >allowed access to info about problems until you've solved them, I don't > >think this can be accommodated within the git framework. > > >Frankly, I'm surprised why anyone bothered targeting PE. Hardly any > >financial incentive. It's not exactly "social media" either. Wanted the > >solutions badly? LOL > > -- > > from: Devon McCormick <[email protected]> > to: Chat forum <[email protected]> > date: 17 June 2014 07:01 > subject: Re: [Jchat] Project Euler knocked down > > This is why we can't have nice things. > > -- > > from: Raul Miller <[email protected]> > to: Chat forum <[email protected]> > date: 16 June 2014 21:42 > subject: Re: [Jchat] Project Euler knocked down > > >Rosettacode.org is also under (mild) attack, with spam account creation and > >what looks like organized irrelevancy. > > I guess someone thinks it's too useful or something? > > -- > > from: Devon McCormick <[email protected]> > reply-to: [email protected] > to: Chat forum <[email protected]> > date: 16 June 2014 10:49 > subject: [Jchat] Project Euler knocked down > > >I've submitted a story to Slashdot about Project Euler being out of > >commission: > >http://slashdot.org/submission/3631443/project-euler-knocked-out-because-of-a-serious-security-issue > > . > > >If enough people vote this up, it could focus some publicity on this > >distressing state of affairs. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
