http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabulary/bang#dyadic now has a
reference to http://www.johndcook.com/blog/binomial_coefficients/ -
does that help at all?

Thanks,

-- 
Raul

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:50 AM, June Kim (김창준) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, it is embarassing but it seems like I forgot what I learned 8 years
> ago.
>
> http://jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-July/015308.html
>
> It looks like the APL's Binomial and J's Out of have the same behavioral
> model.
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:19 PM, June Kim (김창준) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I am translating Iverson's Notation as a Tool of Thought -- it is too be
>> published in a book called Great Papers in Computer Science in Korean.
>>
>> Reading the paper, I have a question about "binomial"(!). This mailing
>> list is of course about J, but I find this place very friendly and the
>> people here widely informed, I post it here.
>>
>> First, look at the passage from the paper:
>>
>> The symbol ! denotes the binomial coefficient function, and the table
>>>  d∘.!d is seen to contain Pascal’s triangle with its apex at the left;
>>> if extended to negative arguments (as with d←¯3 ¯2 ¯1 0 1 2 3) it will
>>> be seen to contain the triangular and higher-order figurate numbers as well.
>>
>>
>> So the author means the outer product of binomial of _3 _2 _1 0 1 2 3
>> contains figurate numbers. However, after looking up many manuals for
>> various versions of APL I couldn't find out clear descriptions for when the
>> arguments are negative(or one is negative and the other positive). I looked
>> up J dictionary and it didn't have clear definition for this case, either.
>>
>> Could anyone please help me out understanding what d∘.!d do with
>> d←¯3 ¯2 ¯1 0 1 2 3 ?
>>
>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to