It would be helpful possibly to include some psuedocode (or real code) in your articles to make the points more clear.
It's not clear to me what the article is arguing or asking. I don't understand this statement - "We can have boxed arguments and we should use them and remove all variables set in the interpreter, as I see it." Does this mean to remove the auto x & y? In other words Instead of add =: 4 : 0 x+y ) add =: 4 : 0 'x y' = [box ?] x + y ) Is that what you are suggesting? On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]> wrote: > https://erlhelinfotech.wordpress.com/2016/08/05/jwithatwist- > number-of-arguments/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
