Thanks. Busy today. Get back shortly. On Jan 18, 2018 12:58 PM, "'Mike Day' via Chat" <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK - I've re-solved it - new method over 10 times faster than my old one, > not as elegant as > Roger's, naturally. Anyway, it does achieve the required answer, though > I encountered one > or two glitches on the way. > > Even when everything looks right, it's difficult to spot primes that you > might have omitted. > > I won't post the code here, but am happy to discuss further with Don. > > Mike > > > On 17/01/2018 00:16, Don Guinn wrote: > >> Has anyone solved problem 111? The web page says my answer is wrong, but I >> have checked and double-checked and can find no error. Perhaps I have >> misunderstood the problem. Just wanted to talk with someone about it th >> see >> where I am messing up. >> >> Thanks >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
