>    1+1
> 2

I suggest you try 2+2, which I know is proven to be 4:

Quite often, in introductory lectures, the professor describes "what we are
working towards".  In a course on Axiomatic Set Theory that I took, "what
we are working towards" was 2+2=4.  Sure enough, we did it in one of the
lectures near the end.

A fellow student SN (who did not take the course) was intrigued and asked
how we did it.  I told him it was rather anti-climatic; we did it by first
proving Peano's Axioms, whence 2+2=4 derives easily.



On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 4:58 AM ethiejiesa via Chat <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Legend speaks of an ancient, ineffible tribe called The Hui. Tales of their
> deeds are only spoken in whispers and shattered through the kaleidescope
> of a
> thousand myths. However, one story that remains in tact is that of The
> Whitney and The Incunabulum[0].
>
> Nobody quite knows what The Whitney really is. Some claim it is the Mortal
> Name
> of an immortal wizard, others claim it is the name of a deep Structure
> within
> the Magick of which the Hui are Guardians and Masters. Either way, in much
> the
> same way that the Abrahamic God birthed the cosmos from His essence in the
> span
> of six days, The Hui recount how The Whitney spake The Incunabulum into
> creation in the span of a single summer afternoon. Scholars still debate
> what
> this truly means.
>
> However, whether it took uncountable aeons or the blink of an eye, we
> mortals
> are left with this Deep and Beautiful Magick called The Incunabulum. Four
> suns
> have passed as I have dedicated my life and soul to plumbing its depths.
> Here
> is my story:
>
>
> Snow sputters into sleet as Spring once again battles to dethrone the Long
> and
> Deep Winter. They say that The Incunabulum derives its energy from the
> Disputes
> of the Seasons, so I decided to strike while the iron is hot and release it
> from its Ancient Bonds, giving the Standard Incantation of Release:
>
>     $ gcc -o ji incunabulum.c
>
> Nay, what angry protective angels spout for their warnings. They do no
> appreciate being woken from the Ancient Slumber. I try again, adding a
> lilt of
> the Ancient Tongue:
>
>     $ gcc -ansi -o ji incunabulum.c
>
> This seems to slightly appease the angels, but my spells are not enough to
> fully allay their disgruntlement. Despite this precipitous start, I decide
> to
> weather the dangers and poke the Summoned Incunabulum:
>
>     $ ./ji
>
> It remains ominously silent. Ready, but giving no indication of its intent.
> This reminds me of the ancient teacher they call Ed from whom we receive
> the
> koan "?" any time our Magick is Untrue. The fables of Ed guide me as I
> decide
> to speak to the Summoned Incunabulum:
>
>     1
>     Segementation fault
>
> Oh, may the Gods of Mercy see my pure intent, this is the Refutation of
> Irrefutability. The Incunabulum is displeased with my Magick. I try again,
> this
> time adding protective wards to my incantation so I may petition the help
> of
> the Lesser Daemons:
>
>     $ gcc -ansi -g -o ji incunabulum.c
>     $ gdb ./ji
>     (gdb) run
>     Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>     _int_malloc (av=av@entry=0x7ffff7f999e0 <main_arena>,
> bytes=bytes@entry=1024) at malloc.c:3742
>     3742    malloc.c: そのようなファイルやディレクトリはありません.
>
> The helper daemons gleefully show me the error of my ways, but as Lesser
> Daemons they know not the Language of Men:
>
>     (gdb) bt
>     #0  _int_malloc (av=av@entry=0x7ffff7f999e0 <main_arena>,
> bytes=bytes@entry=1024) at malloc.c:3742
>     #1  0x00007ffff7e667e4 in __GI___libc_malloc (bytes=1024) at
> malloc.c:3058
>     #2  0x00007ffff7e5098c in __GI__IO_file_doallocate (fp=0x7ffff7f9a500
> <_IO_2_1_stdout_>) at filedoalloc.c:101
>     #3  0x00007ffff7e5f040 in __GI__IO_doallocbuf (fp=fp@entry=0x7ffff7f9a500
> <_IO_2_1_stdout_>) at libioP.h:948
>     #4  0x00007ffff7e5e248 in _IO_new_file_overflow (f=0x7ffff7f9a500
> <_IO_2_1_stdout_>, ch=10) at fileops.c:749
>     #5  0x00007ffff7e54a2e in putchar (c=10) at putchar.c:28
>     #6  0x000055555555558c in nl () at incunabulum.c:26
>     #7  0x00005555555555df in pr (w=0x555555559920) at incunabulum.c:27
>     #8  0x0000555555555869 in main () at incunabulum.c:42
>
> However, I have trained in their tongue and consulting the Incunabulum
> Scroll,
> I see a suspicious Rune:
>
>     $ sed -n 8p incunabulum.c
>     I *ma(n){R(I*)malloc(n*4);}mv(d,s,n)I *d,*s;{DO(n,d[i]=s[i]);}
>
> How silly of me. The Magick of the Ancients is not like the Magick of Men.
> They
> knew how to wield their Power with Wands that were compact and tidy, only
> half
> the size of our Modern Excesses. I know not such Ancient Skills, so I
> attempt
> a hybrid spell of New and Old at my own peril:
>
>     $ sed -i 8s/4/8/ incunabulum.c
>     $ gcc -ansi -o ji incunabulum.c
>     $ ./ji
>     1
>     Segementation fault
>
> Am I meddling in Magick that is best left to enjoy its Rest? Pushing my
> luck, I
> once again enlist the Lesser Daemons and read the Original Runes,
> searching for
> what I have missed. Ah ha!
>
>     $ sed -n 37,40p incunabulum.c
>     noun(c){A z;if(c<'0'||c>'9')R 0;z=ga(0,0,0);*z->p=c-'0';R z;}
>     verb(c){I i=0;for(;vt[i];)if(vt[i++]==c)R i;R 0;}
>     I *wd(s)C *s;{I a,n=strlen(s),*e=ma(n+1);C c;
>      DO(n,e[i]=(a=noun(c=s[i]))?a:(a=verb(c))?a:c);e[n]=0;R e;}
>
> The Whitney wielded Magick with utmost efficiency, not a single wasted
> rune.
> This is a Lore almost completely forgotten. The "noun" rune chooses to not
> announce its Return Gift, meaning it holds to the Bare Truth "all is an
> int".
> But now our Long Wands do not match those of the ancients. I once again
> risk
> Heresy and try again:
>
>     $ sed -i '37s/^/A /' incunabulum.c
>     $ gcc -ansi -o ji incunabulum.c
>     $ ./ji
>     1
>
>     1
>
> Success! An intrepid thought rises in my bosom:
>
>     1+1
>
>     2
>
> Great Whitney! Praise the Hui! This ancient parchment is alive! Having
> read the
> runes carefully, I know The Incunabulum tolerates only statements of Single
> Runes, an demonstration of the austere Beauty in Concision:
>
>     10
>     Segmentation fault
>
> We are punished severely for our heresy: "1" is not of The Monads.
>
>
> I am both chastened and emboldened by this experience. The Whitney,
> whatever
> its True Form may be, has taught me a Deep Beauty that I both knew but
> never
> discovered.
>
>
> [0]: https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Essays/Incunabulum
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to