>>no, favoring emacs over vi is the most insane thought >Now, now no editor wars on Jprograming. Personally i prefer QED ... but i have >not seen an implementation since QUED. Maybe Joey can update us... in JCHAT!
>As to a web assembly version... a great idea! Especially if one can bring the >full capabilities of the native Javascript through. It should be maintained by jsoftware.com alongside of their releases for the likes of Android, Pi etc >Joe Bogner has a great sifting to Javascript with Emscriptem and said he was >interested in a WA version. Hopefully he can chime in with updates. ~greg https://picsrp.github.io -- from: Hauke Rehr <[email protected]> to: [email protected] date: Nov 29, 2020, 5:16 AM subject: Re: [Jprogramming] J and Web Assembly >no, favoring emacs over vi is the most insane thought -- from: emacstheviking <[email protected]> to: [email protected] date: Nov 29, 2020, 3:56 AM subject: [Jprogramming] J and Web Assembly mailing list: Programming forum >Anybody even tried this? >I have spent an hour reading the web assembly docs and I don't see why it >couldn't be done apart from the !: commands which could be problematic. >I'm seeing a 'core' of the J language that provides basic language capability >and then uses the WA interface to providea JS way to call JInit and JDo. >Mad idea? >I am def. going to investigate more over the coming weeks. I have a custom >build of J on my iMac but I think it used gcc rather than clang which is >what's required by the LLVM translation process. >This could be my most insane thought this weekend.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
