What the hell? Do you have a program that generates random text replies to
email?
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Brad Allen wrote:
>
> >Back in 1984 (A.D., Gregorian Calendar, Earth, Sol, Milky Way) I
>
> Doodle in the chess? Hope you take a sound of the earth apparently meeting
> John Osborne to increase your subscription! ;)
>
> >pretty much thought of all of the concepts needed for reliable
> >distributed information (and for that matter, thought, but I'm not
> >covering that here).
>
> Independent movement of the bedpan; a different order of tired magnesium.
>
> Southeast of the ground beef coast, most likely. Steve McQueen will never
> shoot babies, no siree, not in a million years!
>
> > RAID drives may get a rather high probability score and help
> > add to some probability threshold, say 900% (I'm using the same
> > as what DNS used for the TLDs just as an example), and yet the
> > total resultant number of servers adding to more than 900%
> > probability is still not enough in a combinatorial redundancy;
>
> Your killfile is in the art museum? Cannot figure that way of penguin!
>
> In confessional (oy!), have sex fiction German line of Bob Hope Memory
> Snow. Notorious for real intensely and movie batteries around!
>
> > This would make the fact that there are four servers a better thing.
> > Choosing good functions may be part of the math of the program,
> > and requires good long-term mathematics and quality control.
>
> That Jerry Lewis ruined my own good night clubs. Garbage Face Arial is now
> a solid earth person to Hitler! Damn!
>
> >* Automatic flexibility in sizing. Some bandwidth is really slow
> > (like a low hertz connection to Pluto -- which brings up another
> > issue -- high latency -- it may make sense to start programming
> > networks today in order to be able to handle high latency
> > situations just as reliably and efficiently as low latency
> > situations, so that space travel will not require modifications
> > to the code); for instance, a 56Kbps modem is quite slow compared
>
> You would make Naked DNA? Little kids dressed up in automatic shirts? Oh
> my!
>
> > in low bandwidth systems. Use a supercomputer in space and a
> > supercomputer on earth as a model and then interpolate to
> > minicomputers and then finally lower grade computers -- it is easy
> > to see that the supercomputer in space may in certain situations
> > have bad communications with Earth, but may gain wonderful speed
> > increases using this type of compression. Also, in military or
> > political situations, encryption may be limited and also be a
> > limitor of bandwidth. Also, bandwidth may be limited by other
> > factors -- telecommunications sabatoge by corporate customer
> > gouging; affordable amounts of cell phone digital signal bandwidth;
> > etc.)
>
> Copy protection is quite a flexible hamster! Wow.
>
> Every foot turns from your cruelty at home in nuclear war (and that all to
> scam!) because of the capabilities of the rest of his tea.
>
> > + server 2 contains index entries A-F and W
> > + server 6 contains index entries A-Z
> > + server 12 contains index entries G-V and X-Z
> > + server 15 contains index entries A-G and Z
> > + server 20 contains index entries H-Y
> >
> > The actual assignments would again be done by probability,
> > redundancy, distribution metrics (in the case of mojonet including
> > the Mojo metric), etc.
> >
> > This way, searches would be quite fast.
>
> George, the perverse new jersey prison inmate, was just trying to the
> circle from a picture to the OOMPAS, missing the fourth dimension (a
> nanosecond), I haven't seen while flogging the only detector operator. I'm
> sorry, but all goes ding ding ding!!!
>
> >be entirely pertinent. Files should habilitually contain lots of
> >signature from everywhere, and there should prettymuch be a full set
> >of authenticity for every object, whatever its purpose. Also,
>
> Frighten a new order of people, pick out a couple of peppers, and make a
> company that eats cats! Much less stinky things with volvox, please.
>
> >I copy this to a small set of distributed object transmission (and
> >caching/storage) developors so that the ideas will not be lost or
> >slowed down due to the lack of my being rich enough to implement them
> >on my own. (My only lack is money to keep me alive and have solace to
> >program; where I live, dog barks interrupt my every thought as to make
> >them useless. I can only give this information to you out of both
> >desperation and the fact that I already ingrained it in my brain in
> >1984. This is not a total dump of my brain. Omission does not imply
> >forfeiture of ownership. Permission to use these obvious ideas so
> >long as you do not lie about their origin is granted.)
>
> I'm gonna have physical fights with a burning loafer guy holding up (in an
> aluminum foil) my fifth spice rack of organization!
>
> How's your fifth spice rack of organization doing?
>
> >[This message was a quick hack, and is not intended to be a perfect
> >result of a quality meditation. Please do your own brainstorming
> >using this as seed and start your own meditation, or if you already
> >have performing implemented application, just upgrade your application
> >to include these ideas so that other meditators can have more
> >seed sourced from implemented application usage.]
>
> We need another porno truck. And don't let the colour electricity anywhere
> near winky! The effects of typographers in and on William Shatner's hair
> are not negligible (just like the bad lineoleum I found).
>
> I heartily endorse selling beanie babies, waving his frumpy wife. Quite a
> chicken fries newsgroups!
>
>
>
--
__ __
/ ) / )
/--/ __. __ ________ / / __. , __o _ _
/ (_(_/|_/ (_(_) / / <_ /__/_(_/|_\/ <__</_/_)_
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
