Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts about Freenet)

[Sam Joseph]

Tavin Cole wrote: > > What is it with this? Are you telling me that I couldn't set up a P2P > > network that stored cryptographically hashed content and did routing > > like freenet, but where the nodes blocked input of non natural-language > > text files? > You could do this, but it would obviously mean the nodes would be dealing > with unencrypted files. I don't think so. The interface for entering the files would screen out things that weren't natural language, and then encrypt the files before storage. If the files are thus encrypted the system can be as secure as Freenet is now, right? Anyway, clearly I am not helping get my point across by emphasizing this. I'm not trying to persuade anyone to build such a system, it was just a thought experiment (like Einstein's Elevator or Schrodinger's cat) to try and think about whether images were essential for protecting freedom of speech, and now I've got some opinions on that, we don't have to think about a text-only freenet anymore. I'm sorry I raised the possibility in the first place. CHEERS> SAM _______________________________________________ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat