> > Considering: Done! Results: fuckem!
>
> These posts are on public record and could be admissible in court.

And (in case I need to clarify) that is *not* a threat from me. I would
never initiate or cooperate in any action against any Freenet developer or
supporter.

What I'm saying is that these posts contain email headers. In sending
messages to Freenet mailing lists, one may as well put the message in the
New York Times public notices section, complete with one's name and address.


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mr.Bad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Remuneration for artists via Freenet...etc.
>
>
> > >>>>> "MA" == Michael Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >     MA> Note to Freenet producers and users: Consider the aim to move
> >     MA> various industries in which digitized information is the
> >     MA> central product to more sane, rational, humane, and just
> >     MA> methods of operation based on freenet-ish distribution
> >     MA> schemes.
> >
> > Considering: Done! Results: fuckem!
> >
> > ~Mr. Bad
> >
> > --
> >  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >  Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
> >  freenet:MSK@SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
> >  "Statements like this give the impression that this article was
> >   written by a madman in a drug induced rage"  -- Ben Franklin
> >  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chat mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
>


_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

Reply via email to