Quoting Tavin Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Actually, what irritated me was the fproxy "web bugs" he was
distributing.
> Someone had posted a rather obfuscated message about it and I followed
a
> link to see what they were talking about, and realized I'd just managed
> to get my I.P. address on a shit list of alleged pedophiles.
Wonderful.
>
The post I have mentioned every time so far involved test.jpg, child
porno. If you were talking about web bugs, you sure didn't show
it by replying to this message:
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 04:36:44 -0400
From: Tavin Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:58:30PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
> I'm thinking of running this attack against test.jpg (!@#$ childporn,
> as a *test* key? makes us look real bad) It should work. If it does
> any other keys you want dead? test.html might be a good target, again
> makes us look bad. (hey Freenet is anarchy, use a SSK)
I'm personally a little irritated with you appointing yourself the
policeman of Freenet. Censorship and monitoring sucks, period.
just my humble $.02. no offense meant.
--------------------------------------
FREE ANONYMOUS EMAIL! Sign up now.
http://www.subdimension.com/freemail
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
