From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Great! I would encourage you to make FreeWeb integrate with existing
>freenet mechanisms wherever possible. So, for example, in-freenet
>keyindexes could be presented to the end-user as DNS registrars if that
>is your preferred FreeWeb terminology.
I need to clarify my terms here.
keyindex, n: A passive in-Freenet key index, as defined in Freenet specs.
registry, n: An active in-freenet facility, consisting of a daemon that runs
periodically on one or more machines, harvesting one or more keyindexes and
rendering its/their contents into a more convenient form.
registrar, n: A person or organisation which operates a registry
>As a general principal, I would encourage you to make use of existing
>mechanisms wherever possible so that FreeWeb remains as well-integrated
>with the rest of Freenet as possible.
That is my aim.
I certainly don't want to disadvantage FreeWeb by alienating existing
Freenet users, and I don't have the time or marketing budget to shove new
standards down people's throats. My first name ain't Bill and my surname
ain't Gates :) !
Cheers
David
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
