On Tue, 29 May 2001, Timm Murray wrote: > > I will test it, but I would like it better if such a thing were > > implemented in freenet. > > That wasn't the point. This is ment to be a simple network that can be > hacked together in an afternoon or two. Freenet is really complicated (just > look at Whiterose development) and doesn't serve that goal well. Whiterose is way cleaner than Fred. Anyway I have the Anarcast server done (methinks) and the inform server is almost done. Still haven't written the client proxy.... Anyone have a box I can run the inform server on? -- "...it must be held that third-party electronic monitoring, subject only to the self-restraint of law enforcement officials, has no place in our society..." Mark Roberts | [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
- [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! David McNab
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Dev Random
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! mjr
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Timm Murray
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Dev Random
- Re: [freenet-chat] Anarcast! Mathew Ryden