On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, David McNab wrote:
> Make sure to use an offshore anonymous mailing facility, like hushmail
> or better.
This reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask someone: would a
standard webmail site, ie Hotmail, Yahoo, etc., if accessed *entirely*
thru anonymizing proxies, from account setup on, be considered securely
anonymous?
--
__ __
/ ) / )
/--/ __. __ ________ / / __. , __o _ _
/ (_(_/|_/ (_(_) / / <_ /__/_(_/|_\/ <__</_/_)_
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
- [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibility Nomen Nescio
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Seth Johnson
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Nomen Nescio
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Seth Johnson
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Volker Stolz
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Volker Stolz
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... David McNab
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Aaron Guy Davies
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... David McNab
