----- Original Message -----
From: "Volker Stolz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In local.freenet, you wrote:
> > I have noticed this... so I started using the
> > Freenet.client.RequestClient shipped with freenet.jar...
>
> Yes, but it would require grabbing the start page and getting perl
> to extract the freenet-URLs and recursively calling freenet-request.
>
> > Fproxy is not very smart in my opinion. It's getting better
> > though.
>
> Not really fproxy�s fault, but rather "broken by design". Though I
> didn�t check if it�s indeed an invalid URL. But IIRC the only valid
> location for "//" if after the host-part.
You are remembering incorrectly. a "//" is valid in any part of the URI,
becuase URIs don't assume that everything is going to be mapped to a
filesystem quite so cleanly. "//" is the prettiest, cleanest identifier for
denoting cdoc msk handling that I have seen. If you can find one that
doesn't include any of "!@#$%^&*()[]{}<>~|\" and is 7-bit clean, i'd be
interested in hearing it though. Actually, I might be able to live without
\. it's only use to me was going to be to make sure the // wasn't being used
as a cdoc identifier when it shoudln't be.
> --
> Volker Stolz * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * PGP + S/MIME
-Mathew
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
