Those aren't quite monadic and dyadic cases. Consider a real dyadic case of the derived function:
Window reduction in Dyalog APL: 3 +/ iota 10 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Bob On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:01 -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Nov 27, 2007 3:58 PM, metaperl.j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Title says all: does APL overload operators for monadic and dyadic cases? > > Yes. > > For example, consider / -- in APL > +/1 2 3 > works just like it does in J. > > And, > 1 0 1/1 2 3 > works like 1 0 1#1 2 3 does in J. > > However, APL did not have tacit definitions, so this syntactic quirk was > not a very big deal there. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
