On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Don Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > I was not asking for an answer to the question, I already knew the > answer. I was noting that this was the question that I had asked myself. > > I did not seek an answer in terms of the rules of tacit J. I knew the > rules and why these rules lead to this result. I was asking myself why the > rules of J are as they are and produce such a result. I figured out why > eventually and posted it on 22nd April.
You made two posts in this thread on April 22 and I see no mention of this issue in either of them. If you were referring to your post on April 24, I would appreciate it if you attempted to address some of my problems which I detailed in http://jsoftware.com/pipermail/chat/2009-April/001624.html Alternatively, if you were referring to something else, could you provide an unambiguous reference, so I [for example] I could distinguish between a case where I have overlooked something critical in your treatment of this issue and a case where I have found a significant flaw in your treatment of this issue? Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
