Hi Raul,
I stated:
> To turn it into a revised form of tacit J, replace all the "y"s with "]"
> and
> enclose in parentheses: (%:(+/*:] -(+/])%#])%<:#])
You stated
I believe this would still be explicit. In this proposal, ] and [ would
become
argument names, would not be verbs.
My response:
I have a example from Skip Cave, which he tells me is tacit form. Skip
says:
"Here's the tacit phrase expanded fully, with arguments and the result:
(y = i. 21 x = 3)
3 (<:@[ <.[ <.@(] * [ % [: >./ ]) (- <./)@]) i. 21
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 "
Is Skip wrong then and not giving me a tacit form?
Don
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
