>I think it would be best to keep the discussion public, because the more >eyes the better. [...] Does anyone object?
For "chat", anything goes (and I don't give a damn). I *do* object to messages submited to "programming" with lots of geral statements, handwaving, but not a single line of specific J _program_ and its possible vectorised/parallised implementation. Since my nerves are already worn thin by the "Annoted Dictionary" mega thread "over there", here a small reminder how the "programming" forum is defined [on http://jsoftware.com/forums.htm]: "programming - the main forum, covering J programming from beginner to expert, and announcements" Repeat: "covering J programming". That is NOT: "covering the didactics of J programming". That is NOT: "covering implementations of J". While the latter are certainly worthwile topics, they are just off-topic noise in "programming". Martin This message typed on a device with limited tolerances. Excuse any overly harsh expressions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
