On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Tirrell, Jordan (Consultant) <[email protected]> wrote: > If we don't know what x ^ y should mean for two quaternions, then maybe > that is our answer. If there isn't a natural, meaningful and/or useful > definition, why does it need to be defined?
I do not think that this is the issue. But a preliminary implementation might indeed treat some quaternion cases as domain errors. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
