On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Roger Hui <[email protected]> wrote: > Not bad. The remaining thing to do about this, is to think > about other extensions which may be possible to do > with f :: n, which would be pre-empted with the proposed change.
The only thing I can think of involves gerunds, and I am not sure if any such thing would be useful. However, if you are in doubt, you can make the constant function thing not happen for boxes. > p.s. Why is this in "Chat"? Chat is "all other discussions on computer languages and J " That seemed appropriate for this case? -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
