This is true, but I am not very optimistic about the efficiency of initial implementations, especially for programs on that scale.
-- Raul On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Thomas Costigliola <[email protected]> wrote: > There will also be less bugs, if any. > > And to go another step, if you have a compiler you can implement the > interpreter in J. > On Mar 16, 2012 5:46 PM, "Raul Miller" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Gilles Kirouac <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > @Raul >> > >> > Why Haskell? >> >> If you have a haskell implementation, you have a compiler. >> >> -- >> Raul >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
