It's not a train, but it's not tacit either as "- verb, 3" has a noun argument - 3. It is the the negation of the result of "verb" with an argument of the ravel of 3. The expression is satisfied and returns a noun result.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Alexander Epifanov <[email protected]>wrote: > # - verb, = - verb, 3 - not verb => its not a train => tacit, correct? > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Ric Sherlock <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Note that 3&=@# isn't really tacit in the sense that you aren't using > >> forks or hooks. However you haven't referred to the arguments because > >> you were able to create the new verb by combining the noun and verbs > >> using conjunctions, so in that sense it is tacit. > > > > Not using hooks nor forks makes it "not a train". > > > > It's tacit. > > > > -- > > Raul > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > -- > Regards, > Alexander. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
