Yes, one of my favorites from Surely You're Joking - to learn what the 
symbols on mechanical blueprints for a plant meant Feynman pointed at an 
unknown (to him) symbol and said, "What happens if this valve gets stuck?"

My test shot did get a response too when, in addition to Roger's 
recollection -

On 2012/05/11 05:18 , Jeffrey Shallit wrote:
>
>     It was 1973.  I do remember computing lots of things like that in
>     a small workspace, but I don't have any memory of that precise
>     incident!
>
I'm not surprised to be off by a year... and as expected, he didn't 
remember the incident. But it was 16 years before the Feynman book.


On 2012/05/11 10:19 , km wrote:
> The story is on page 124 of Feynman's "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!"
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
> On May 11, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Roger Hui<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
>> The Feynman story I remember was that he was shown a complicated
>> engineering diagram.  He pointed to a place at random and asked, "are you
>> sure this works?"
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Joey K Tuttle<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> Well, clearly Ron's idea for the humorous notation didn't come from the
>>> Feynman book as it wasn't published until 18 years later...
>>>
>>> By the way, I just dropped a PDF of Surely You're Joking into iBook on my
>>> iPad. It is a fun book that I will enjoy reading again. But searches for
>>> phrases and digit didn't turn up a similar story...
>>>
>>> - joey    iPa...
>>>
>>> On May 10, 2012, at 14:23, Roger Hui<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Ron Frank came in, looked at the copy on his desk, circled a
>>>>> digit towards the end of the long number and wrote, "Are you sure about
>>>>> this digit?" and put it back on the Desk Jeff was using.
>>>> This sounds very much like an anecdote in Richard Feynman's *Surely
>>> You're
>>>> Joking, Mr. Feynman?* But then my memory is going too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joey K Tuttle<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Upon looking a little more at the page -
>>>>>
>>>>> http://zenwerx.com/projects/pi-digits/pi/
>>>>>
>>>>> mentioned in the post below, I was amused to note that the last 138 of
>>>>> the 4,194,304 places of pi displayed on that page are random and/or
>>>>> wrong. Problems begin about decimal place 4194166 which is shown as 9
>>>>> but should be 7. I suppose such errors are not very high up on the list
>>>>> of misrepresentations on web pages, but in my case it caused a smile and
>>>>> memory of an event that took place some 40 years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeffery Shallit ( http://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~shallit/ ) was a summer
>>>>> intern at the IBM Philadelphia Scientific Center in 1972 (I think). He
>>>>> was working on some high precision computations using APL. I can't
>>>>> remember whether it was a precise evaluation of pi to several thousand
>>>>> places, or perhaps Mersenne prime #24  ( _1 + 2^19937x ) - but in any
>>>>> case, Jeffery had succeeded in printing out this lengthy number, and
>>>>> left a copy of the pages of digits on several people's desks. The next
>>>>> morning, Ron Frank came in, looked at the copy on his desk, circled a
>>>>> digit towards the end of the long number and wrote, "Are you sure about
>>>>> this digit?" and put it back on the Desk Jeff was using.
>>>>>
>>>>> That afternoon, Jeff came in and discovered the note and raced into
>>>>> Ron's office saying, "How do you know that digit is wrong??" To which
>>>>> Ron calmly replied, "I have no idea if it is correct or not - I was just
>>>>> asking if you were sure...."
>>>>>
>>>>> I was (am still) impressed with Jeffery's work because he did it in an
>>>>> 80Kbyte APL workspace. Hard to imagine these days when it is routine to
>>>>> work with a hundred thousand times that much memory.... Although I note
>>>>> that J only consumes 80704 bytes to calculate _1 + 2^19937x   that's
>>>>> impressive too.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've copied Jeffery on this note, and wish I had an address to pass my
>>>>> memory past Ron. In my experience, it seems likely to me that either
>>>>> they wouldn't have any memory of such an event, or might have versions
>>>>> quite different from my memory. It is strange/interesting how our
>>>>> memories work.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2012/05/08 09:44 , Joey K Tuttle wrote:
>>>>>> Being a fan of things pi, I'm wondering about several things in your
>>>>> post.
>>>>>> The URL you give points to a site purporting to have 4 (not 50) million
>>>>>> digits of pi. Maybe I missed a pointer to a larger dataset.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2012/05/08 03:56 , Joe Bohart wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've load 50 million integer digits of pi and trying to do a moving
>>>>> average
>>>>>> on them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NB. data from http://zenwerx.com/projects/pi-digits/pi/
>>>>>> NB. used perl to write each digits on 1 line of file data
>>>>>>
>>>>>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to