You mix up things. You'll have to learn how to use GHCi. I have //////////////////////// f x = x + 1
main = print $ f 2 //////////////////////// in a file gedoe.hs I can load this in GHCi Prelude> :l ./zandbak/gedoe [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( zandbak/gedoe.hs, interpreted ) Ok, modules loaded: Main. and use it in GHCi *Main> main 3 (0.00 secs, 0 bytes) or *Main> f 2 3 But also in GHCi as I showed you before (use another function name ) *Main> let g x = x + 1 (0.00 secs, 0 bytes) *Main> g 2 3 Compiling file gedoe.hs and running *Main> :! ghc --make ./zandbak/gedoe.hs [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( zandbak/gedoe.hs, zandbak/gedoe.o ) Linking zandbak/gedoe ... *Main> :! ./zandbak/gedoe 3 note: with :! I can execute shell commands from within GHCi. Hope this helps. On 21-06-12 19:46, Raul Miller wrote: > But this statement is not legal in compiled haskell -- so even if I > could pretend that the original statement was not in haskell, this new > example would still suggest to me that interpreted haskell and > compiled haskell are different languages. > > What this 'let' example brings to the table is that neither is a > subset of the other. > -- Met vriendelijke groet, @@i = Arie Groeneveld ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
