No problem. I'll proceed with the commit.
On 18 Aug 2009, at 11:22, David Nuescheler wrote:
hi dave,
this is great, thanks a lot for the contribution.
i perfectly understand that you may want to be careful about the
initial commit, but it helps to be aware of the fact that i think we
all
agree that we are operating under a CTR policy[1] for chemistry.
so don't be shy ;)
regards,
david
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#CommitThenReview
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:37 AM, David
Caruana<[email protected]> wrote:
All,
I think the AtomPub TCK is now in a good enough state to commit to
the
Chemistry code base. Gabriele and I have reached the first goal of
re-packaging the Alfresco CMIS tests, removing Alfresco
dependencies and
complying with Chemistry conventions. We've also taken the
opportunity to
refactor much of the original code to make it easier to add and
organise
tests.
The TCK is far from complete, but it now feels correct to continue
development within Chemistry.
Currently, the source code is hosted at...
https://svn.alfresco.com/repos/contrib/chemistry-tck-atompub
I'd appreciate a review of the above before I commit.
There are several TODOs that'll be worked on as soon as we've
committed:
- merge the TCK Abdera extension with the one in already in Chemistry
- improve test result logging (descriptions on asserts, control
over where
to log)
- make it easier to provide test options to tests
- refactor tests that require custom type definitions (these are
currently
disabled)
- use org.apache.chemistry.util.GregorianCalendar
Regards,
Dave
--
David Nuescheler
Chief Technology Officer
mailto: [email protected]
web: http://www.day.com/ http://dev.day.com
twitter: @daysoftware
