I'm implementing it in chemistry-atompub-client
APPDocument and APPConnection as new feature.

Emanuele

> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Emanuele Lombardi
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Florent,
> > I'm sorry, but I don't speak english very well. I try to explain my 
> > question.
> > I'm implementing the versioning services in particular the checkOut/checkIn 
> > operations.
>
> You're implementing it in what codebase? Is this your code for a
> backend of your own? Or are you implementing it for the JCR bindings?
> Or in the "Simple" codebase (which, I repeat, is here to exercise the
> APIs and server/client bindings)?
>
> Florent
>
> > The CMIS spec say "The value of the cmis:isVersionSeriesCheckedOut property 
> > MUST be TRUE." on other Documents in the Version Series. So I retrieve all 
> > the documents in the checked out document's version series and set their 
> > poperty cmis:isVersionSeriesCheckedOut=true and then I call the save method 
> > on the document.
> > After the implementation I write unit test using Simple Implementation and 
> > when I assert if cmis:isVersionSeriesCheckedOut is true it fail because the 
> > property is readOnly and the save method don't modify it.
> >
> > Thanks and I hope this explanation is comprensible
> >
> > Emanuele
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Hi Emanuele,
> >>
> >> I don't understand what code your talking about. You seem to talk
> >> about the internals of a repository exposed through Chemistry, in
> >> which you want to have the property cmis:isVersionSeriesCheckedOut
> >> take different values. But this is a system property, entirely managed
> >> by the backend repository or its mapping the the Chemistry model, so I
> >> don't understand why changing its exposed value would be a problem.
> >>
> >> If you're talking about the current "Simple" implementation used in
> >> the unit tests, then versioning isn't implemented yet, and the
> >> management of cmis:isVersionSeriesCheckedOut (which is tied to
> >> versioning) is not coded either.
> >>
> >> The PROP_IS_VERSION_SERIES_CHECKED_OUT of SimpleType is how we expose
> >> this property to user code. We cannot have it be "read-write when
> >> checked out", as this is a system property and the CMIS spec mandates
> >> it to be "Read Only".
> >>
> >> Keep in mind that the "Simple" implementation is not really meant to
> >> be a base for implementing a new repository (except for very simple
> >> classes like SimpleObjectId), it's there mainly for unit tests and to
> >> prove that the different levels of the APIs and client/server mappings
> >> work all right together.
> >>
> >> Florent
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Emanuele Lombardi
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Florent,
> >> > Now I have another problem, when I invoke the checkOut service on a 
> >> > document I must, for example, set the property IsVersionSeriesCheckedOut 
> >> > on other documents in the version series. But this property is read-only 
> >> > and the putEntry method don't update it.
> >> > My proposal is to set the propertyDefinition updatability to "read-write 
> >> > when checked out". Is it possible?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Emanuele
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Emanuele,
> >> >>
> >> >> As it happens I'm working on adding update code right now, I should
> >> >> have something working tomorrow (for the trunk).
> >> >>
> >> >> Florent
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Emanuele Lombardi
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> > I'm working on versioning services, but I have a problem :The 
> >> >> > Updating of CmisObject's properties.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > My procedure:
> >> >> > First I set the property value by CMISObject#setValue method and last 
> >> >> > I call the save method. The save method if is an update require a 
> >> >> > server method not yet implemented and I try to implement it (the 
> >> >> > method is 
> >> >> > "org.apache.chemistry.atompub.server.CMISObjectsCollection.putEntry(ObjectEntry,
> >> >> >  String, Date, List<Person>, String, Content, RequestContext)") But 
> >> >> > my implementation doesn't work. If I'm not able to save the modified 
> >> >> > properties on the repository I can't test the versioning services.
> >> >> > Can you help me? I attach my code.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Emanuele
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Florent Guillaume, Head of R&D, Nuxeo
> >> >> Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
> >> >> http://www.nuxeo.com   http://www.nuxeo.org   +33 1 40 33 79 87
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Emanuele Lombardi
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
> >> Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
> >> http://www.nuxeo.com   http://www.nuxeo.org   +33 1 40 33 79 87
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
> Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
> http://www.nuxeo.com   http://www.nuxeo.org   +33 1 40 33 79 87
>

Reply via email to