I'm going to proceed with a). Dave
On 16 Feb 2010, at 10:25, Jens Hübel wrote: > I would vote for a) because it makes separate compilation easier and until we > really have something merged I would prefer to keep the structure simple. I > think it makes life also easier for both users of opencmis and the existing > Chemistry code base. > > Jens > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Caruana [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2010 10:50 > To: [email protected] > Subject: OpenCMIS svn commit - a question > > re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-113 > > Now we have IP clearance for OpenCMIS, it's time to commit the source code to > the Chemistry svn. > > Before doing so, I have a question regarding its location. > > We can either: > > a) create a peer opencmis directory to chemistry, and place all the code in > there > b) add the opencmis modules within the chemistry directory > > Option a) is frankly easier, but option b) gives a clearer intent to merge > the code lines. However, it will require merging maven poms etc now. > > I'm currently swaying to a), but can easily be diverted. > > Dave >
