Hm the Document.copy() signature is unusable as-is, because it doesn't include a destination folderId parameter. I'll do an update (and probably remove some of the bindings-like arguments) after 0.1.0 is released.
Florent On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Florent Guillaume <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Florian, > > Oops I'd missed it, I was looking for a copy() on CmisObject because > I'd forgotten that (obviously given the method name) > createDocumentFromSource only applies to Documents. > > Florent > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Florian Müller > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Florent, >> >> I like the idea. There is already a copy() method on Document that isn't >> implemented yet. That could be the right place. >> >> - Florian >> >> >> On 13/09/2010 17:19, Florent Guillaume wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What do you think about adding a "copy" operation at the high-level >>> CmisObject level? This would map to >>> objectService.createDocumentFromSource and for AtomPub we'd have to do >>> a client-side implementation that would preserve the basic copy >>> semantics. >>> >>> Florent >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo > Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) > http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87 > -- Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
