Hey guys,
I'm happy with this as long as you guys are, meaning: adding the CMIS
Workfbench to trunk means aligning it to a (potentially) slower
release process then if it would be alone.
On the other hand it will be part of a build which was already proved
to be working for the ASF legal requirements.
Ah, and +1 for the new name :)
Ciao,
Gab
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:25 PM, David Caruana wrote:
+1
On 5 Oct 2010, at 13:07, Florian Müller wrote:
Here is a proposal for a new name: CMIS Workbench
WDYT?
Florian
On 05/10/2010 10:10, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Yes it's a very nice and useful tool.
Whatever location is fine with me, but I can see the attraction of
having it built and released with the rest of the distribution for
now.
Florent
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Florian Müller
<florian.muel...@alfresco.com> wrote:
I'm fine with rebranding it and moving it the trunk if there is
enough
interest. I will certainly use it regardless of where the code
resides. :)
We could also make the Web Start version available from the
OpenCMIS web
site if this helps to get hold of it.
Florian
On 05/10/2010 08:27, Jens Hübel wrote:
HI Chemistry,
the cmis swing client has proven to be a very useful tool here.
I think it
has reached a certain level of functionality and stability and
so I wonder
if we should make it part of the opencmis trunk. Having this
part of our
distribution and being able to simply download the final
application would
simplify things a bit.
Comments?
By the way perhaps someone also has an idea for a better (and
shorter)
name for this tool? "laboratory" for Chemistry or "applied"
Chemistry or ...
there must be something better...
Jens
--
Eng. Gabriele Columbro
Alfresco Software, Ltd.
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
