Hi Florent,
Inheritance would be very difficult. The implementations of Document and
TransientDocument, for example, are too different.
We could create common interfaces that cover all property getters. That
would clean up the existing interfaces a bit, but would also create six
new interfaces that I can't see a real use case for. Let me know if I'm
missing something.
My idea behind the CmisObjectAdapter interface was to make the whole
thing more type save. Could you provide a sample use case that would
require reusing a third-party interface? Doesn't an adapter need to be
designed for CMIS?
- Florian
On 19/11/2010 18:58, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Hi,
There's a lot of duplication of methods from, for instance, Document
and TransientDocument.
Couldn't one inherit from the other (I guess not), or couldn't they
have a common base interface?
Also I don't think we need a base CmisObjectAdapter interface, it's
actually useful to be able to adapt to any third-party interface. I'll
deal with making getAdapter not need that (and use generics).
Florent
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Florian Müller
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
Merge is done. Please test and provide feedback.
Thanks,
Florian
On 15/11/2010 13:50, Florian Müller wrote:
Hi all,
If nobody objects, I will merge the client API refactoring branch into
trunk this Wednesday.
If there are any reasons not to merge, please let me know as soon as
possible!
Cheers,
Florian
