Evert Meulie wrote: > I currently use the regular logrotate to deal with the Cherokee > weblogs, and do a restart of Cherokee after the rotate. > > Is this a good idea? Or should I switch over to cherokee_logrotate > instead? My server is low traffic, and I don't give a hoot if the > restart would happen to disconnect anyone... :-P
If you don't mind about restarting the server, I think logrotate is fair enough. cherokee_logrotate is a bit more complex to configure, and in your case, it won't provide you new functionality. It's meant to be used on very high traffic hosts that shouldn't be down a few seconds while the log file is moved. -- Greetings, alo. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
