A.D.F. wrote, On 01/12/06 19:50:
>> What do you think of this?
>>
>> http://www.zdziarski.com/projects/mod_evasive/
>>
>> It looks kind of interesting to me. Do you think it worth writing
>> something like that for Cherokee?
>
> Maybe in the future because many load balancers have these capabilities
> and because the interesting part should interact with external
> subsystems (firewall, etc.) or devices (so some portability issues
> could arise); anyway it could be part of the wish list of 0.7 branch.
Yeah, I already added to the TODO list for 0.7:
http://www.cherokee-project.com/bugs/login/browser/cherokee/trunk/TODO
Actually, it's something I'd use in my server, so I suppose it's
kind of the same of the rest of the people.
> Right now it might be more useful to add to Cherokee some smart
> algorithms to fight / prevent the most common effects of nasty
> overload scenarios (i.e.: too many connections, too many requests,
> etc.).
handler_cgi_base seems to be the perfect place for it. In that way,
the fcgi, scgi and cgi handlers would inherit it. Although I'm not
quite sure we're on time for the 0.6 release. We ought to release
0.6.0 as soon as possible rather than continue adding new features,
it's already full of new stuff.
--
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
