Alvaro Lopez Ortega dijo [Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:16:54PM +0100]: > >> I suppose that we could start supporting the most used directives > >> like "include", "echo" and "exec" and implement the rest later on. > > > > Hummm... Álvaro, do you really think it is a desirable feature? > > After all, PHP _is_ a SSI language. Yes, not exactly the one being > > requested, but functionally equivalent. And -of course, IMHO- this > > is one of the few "correct" uses of PHP ;-) > > We ought to let people make that decision by themselves, don't you > think? Independently of whether we think SSI is a good technology or > not.. ;-) > > Actually, I suppose it worth investing a reasonable amount of work > to write it down once the rest of the higher priority tasks are done > and dusted. Currently it isn't in my top priority task list, but if > someone writes it down I'd be happy to include it.
On principle, I agree - The more choice, the better. However, how many brain-dead, broken SSI dialects do you want to include? Yes, of course, you cannot expect to have a major Web server which does not support PHP. Having CGI, FastCGI, SCGI is also a must. However, adding support for every crappy extension will make Cherokee become yet-another-patchy-web-server. Do you want that? :) Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
