Alvaro Lopez Ortega dijo [Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:49:42PM +0100]: > Well, we need all the testing that people can perform. Cherokee 0.6 > is meant to be released within a month, so we'd better start doing > some serious testing. > > All kind of the testing, bug reports and questions are welcome. The > upcoming version (current trunk in the repository) has change quite > a bit since we forked it from the 0.5 branch: we've got a brand new > configuration system, a few new modules and many performance > improvements. > > By the way, wouldn't be better to use SCGI handler rather than the > HTTP mirror module? Actually, I suppose it depends on how performs > each one of the modules on the RoR side.
SCGI is strongly deprecated in RoR. The only implementation (which I found out to be quite good, shame the author didn't go on with it) is basically dead. The current wave is to use Mongrel as an application server - Mongrel basically gets the bare HTTP request, and could be used without even getting Cherokee involved. The Mongrel people, however, still recommend using a fast Web server (they often promote lighttpd) for serving dynamic content, or possibly invoking an array of application servers, as Mongrel+Rails is not exactly thread safe, and under some circumstances, requests might block others from being processed at all. But yes, when you announced the mirror handler, I also thought right away of RoR. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
