Brian Rosner wrote: > I > really like having the ability to edit the server configuration file by > hand. The current 0.6 configuration syntax is quite honestly and pain > in the ass. I also really like the idea of having a web interface to > the configuration file for quick edits or more complex integrations. > It does mean more code to maintain, but it is already where Cherokee is > heading. > > I looked a little into the YAML stuff. Quite honestly YAML makes me > more sick than XML. Perhaps it is just a misconception I have with it > or the fact that it is something new to me and I don't want to spend > the time to learn it. XML is just too big and bulky (much like Java > for me. Maybe that is why those two get along).
I'm in the same camp. I've looked at a third path a.k.a json (http://www.json.org/) for other projects and wonder if json had been considered. --- eric -- Speech-recognition in use. It makes mistakes, I correct some. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
